Access to VAD should not depend on your postcode
Patrick, 38 from Central Queensland, had end-stage liver disease. He wanted to die peacefully using voluntary assisted dying (VAD), on his patio with his wife Helena by his side, dogs at his feet and his family behind him.
But his choice was taken away by an outdated federal law which bans electronic communications for VAD, meaning his script had to be sent by post to Brisbane, adding needless delays.
Tragically, this was time Patrick didn't have. He died waiting.
Please help fix this broken law so no other family goes through with Patrick's did.
Access to VAD should not depend on your postcode
Patrick, 38 from Central Queensland, had end-stage liver disease. He wanted to die peacefully using voluntary assisted dying (VAD), on his patio with his wife Helena by his side, dogs at his feet and his family behind him.
But his choice was taken away by an outdated federal law which bans electronic communications for VAD, meaning his script had to be sent by post to Brisbane, adding needless delays.
Tragically, this was time Patrick didn't have. He died waiting.
Please help fix this broken law so no other family goes through with Patrick's did.
Regional Australians don't have the same access to VAD as people in the city.
And it all comes down to one outdated line in a federal law which bans the use of telehealth for VAD - and any other electronic communication (such as phone calls and email).
This is devastating for people in regional areas, who often live thousands of kilometres from their VAD doctors and have to wait weeks to be visited at home or for VAD scripts to be sent by post. Some die waiting.
It's hard enough for dying people and their carers. Why make it even harder?
It's an easy one-line fix.
Please email the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland - she has the power to make this change.
Top tips
Key messages